Tool

Lineup builder — five positions, one captain pick

A browser-based roster tool that combines your card collection with the desk's fixture-adjusted expected value. Pick a captain, set your vice-captain and lock the lineup before the matchday deadline.

Updated WeeklyReading time 5 minutes

How to use the lineup builder

The lineup builder is a browser-based tool. Open the tool, select your five starting positions plus a captain and a vice-captain, and the tool returns a fixture-adjusted expected value across all five licensed leagues. The bench is automatically populated from your remaining cards.

  1. Pick a mode

    Choose Champion Europe, Champion Americas, Champion Asia, Under-23 or All-Star. The tool filters eligible cards by mode.

  2. Set five positions

    Select one goalkeeper, one defender, one midfielder, one forward and one flex position. The tool surfaces the highest-EV card at each position by default.

  3. Set your captain

    Tap any card in your lineup to set it as captain. Tap again to set it as vice-captain. The tool recalculates fixture-adjusted EV automatically.

  4. Lock the lineup

    Once the lineup is set, lock it before the matchday deadline. The tool sends a reminder 30 minutes before the deadline.

Tablet displaying a five-position football lineup with cards arranged by position

What the tool shows you

The lineup builder returns a fixture-adjusted expected value for every card in your collection, sorted by position. The tool flags rotation risk (consecutive starts, travel load), injury risk (last-start minutes) and captain-pick upside (fixture-adjusted EV at the 20× multiplier).

The tool never buys or sells cards on your behalf. The tool never submits a lineup on your behalf. The captain pick is your decision — the tool only surfaces the data.

Why we built it

The desk built the lineup builder because existing tools required either a paid subscription or a manual spreadsheet. The free version of the lineup builder runs entirely in the browser, with no signup and no data sharing. Your card collection stays on your device.

Desk framework

Lineup construction: the questions that matter

Sorare Journal approaches how a manager turns a card gallery into a coherent matchday entry. The starting point is evidence rather than promotion. Rules can change, card utility can move with competition design, and football availability can change close to a deadline. Managers should therefore compare the current official interface and published terms with their own account status before acting.

The desk records expected minutes, positional balance, correlations and captain risk. None of those signals deserves to be read alone. A promising player may have uncertain minutes; a scarce card may have limited contest utility; an apparently simple account action may carry wallet or record-keeping consequences. The editorial aim is to expose those trade-offs without converting uncertain information into a confident forecast.

A good Sorare decision remains understandable after the deadline: the manager can state the rule, the evidence, the downside and the reason for acting.
Sorare Journal editorial desk

A practical review sequence

  1. Confirm the source

    Open the official product or account interface directly. Check the domain, publication context and effective wording. Search snippets, social posts and screenshots can be stale or incomplete.

  2. Record the conditions

    Write down eligibility, deadline, card scarcity, competition, region and account requirements that apply. A decision log prevents memory from changing after an outcome is known.

  3. Test the downside

    Ask what happens if a player misses the fixture, a transaction is delayed, a promotion does not qualify or a support review takes longer than hoped. Do not commit money needed elsewhere.

  4. Verify before submission

    Recheck the final screen and retain relevant confirmations. For market activity, verify the player, season, scarcity and price denomination before bidding or listing.

Methodology note

How the desk checks and updates the record

Our hierarchy begins with official rules, account interfaces and transaction records available to the reader. Public ledger information can help confirm card identity or transfer history, but it does not explain every commercial or eligibility condition. Club communications and established reporting can clarify football availability; rumours are treated as leads rather than settled facts.

We separate observed facts from interpretation. An observed fact might be a published eligibility rule or a displayed deadline. Interpretation includes whether that rule suits a particular gallery, budget or risk tolerance. Market listings are asking prices, not proof of completed value. When a number cannot be reproduced from a named source, the desk avoids presenting it as verified.

CheckEvidence soughtReader action
IdentityOfficial domain, account or card identifiersMatch details character by character
EligibilityCurrent competition or offer wordingSave the applicable conditions
Football statusReliable team and competition informationRecheck near the deadline
Market contextComparable completed activity where visibleTreat listings as unconfirmed intent
Account safetySecurity and recovery controlsNever share passwords or recovery secrets

What the desk sees

Most avoidable mistakes begin with compressed decision time. A manager follows a link from a message, assumes an old rule still applies, or buys before checking whether the card fits the intended competition. A short pause is often more valuable than another prediction. Independent coverage can organise the questions, but Sorare SAS controls its product and official support channels.

Frequently asked questions

Does editorial coverage guarantee an outcome?

No. Football performance, market demand, product rules and account reviews remain uncertain. Reporting supports a decision process; it cannot remove risk.

How often should a manager recheck information?

Recheck whenever money, identity, wallet access or a lineup deadline is involved. Also verify after an app update or rules notice, because remembered instructions may no longer match the live product.

Can a public ledger settle every dispute?

No. It may show certain card or transfer events, while account eligibility, payment processing, identity checks and contest settlement may depend on systems not fully represented there.

Where should an account-specific problem go?

Use the platform's official support route. Send a concise chronology and non-sensitive evidence. Sorare Journal cannot access accounts or change platform decisions.

Related reads

What to read next

Continue with Captain Picks for the closest operational topic. Then review Points System for a second perspective and Game Modes for the relevant account, rules or strategy context. Together they form a clearer decision trail than any isolated claim.

Field notes

Operational checks before and after a decision

For roster construction, the desk recommends maintaining a dated record rather than relying on recollection. Record the question being answered, the official wording available at the time, the account or competition context, and any assumptions that remain unresolved. That discipline matters because a later outcome can make an uncertain choice look obvious. Contemporary notes preserve what a manager could reasonably know before acting.

A useful distinction in roster construction is the difference between access, eligibility and value. Access means a feature or route is available. Eligibility means the account, card or lineup satisfies the current conditions. Value is personal and depends on budget, alternatives and risk tolerance. One does not prove another. A visible option may be ineligible, while an eligible action may still be a poor fit for the manager.

Football context also changes the interpretation of roster construction. Fixtures move, players rotate, injuries emerge and competition calendars overlap. Managers should avoid treating a previous matchday as a permanent template. Recheck official football information and product rules close to the relevant deadline, while allowing enough time to avoid rushed wallet, market or account decisions.

Cost should be measured beyond the headline amount. With roster construction, consider transaction charges, currency conversion, time spent monitoring, resale uncertainty and the opportunity cost of holding a card that does not serve the intended contest. The cheapest apparent option is not automatically the least expensive over a season. The desk favours explicit limits and comparisons made in one consistent denomination.

Account security is part of roster construction, not a separate administrative chore. Navigate through a saved official address, inspect unexpected prompts, protect email access and store recovery information away from ordinary chat or cloud notes. Legitimate support should not need a password or secret recovery phrase. If a request feels unusual, stop and reopen the official support route independently.

Editorial independence requires a boundary between explanation and endorsement. Sorare Journal may describe roster construction, link to related resources and identify questions worth asking. It cannot see private account records, guarantee platform decisions or promise future card demand. Commercial links are disclosed, and readers remain responsible for checking the live terms before committing money or personal information.

After any significant action involving roster construction, run a short review. Confirm what happened, compare it with the expected process, save non-sensitive evidence and note any unresolved issue. If support is needed, provide a chronological summary rather than a long speculative message. Clear records make errors easier to identify and reduce the chance of exposing information that is irrelevant to the case.

The desk treats uncertainty as information. When roster construction depends on missing team news, unclear wording or an incomplete transaction status, the correct response may be to wait. A missed auction or contest can be frustrating, but urgency is not evidence. Managers who define a stopping rule in advance are less likely to chase a decision after its original rationale has weakened.

Play on Sorare Live tournaments every matchday
PLAY NOW